Debt Prison

debt, credit, collection agencies, bills, harass

Advertisement

Posts Tagged ‘ interest ’

It’s estimated that the average American family has eight different credit card accounts.  How did this happen?  Having just watched the Frontline special “Secret History of the Credit Card“, I was quite amazed at the evolution of the modern Credit Card Industry.  It seems that South Dakota was the State where the credit card industry really began to prosper.  Sioux Falls South Dakota is one of the major credit card processing locations in America, processing millions of pieces of mail daily.  From credit card offers to incoming payments, the Post Office in Sioux City is quite the hot spot.

**Disclaimer – Debtprison.net does not administer legal or financial advice. The contents of this website are my opinions on collection agencies and how to deal with them. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as legal advice or council. No opinions on this website should be used to replace the advice of your financial advisor or your legal council.

Why South Dakota?

Prior to 1979, South Dakota had many laws dictating the interest rates that loan agencies and banks could charge for certain items.  For example, they had one interest rate for new cars and another for used cars.  At the time South Dakota, like all of America, was in a recession.  So to encourage banks to loan money they removed these caps on interest rates.  Meanwhile in New York, the Chairman of Citibank Walter Wriston, was looking for another state in which to do business.  New York had ‘usury’ laws which permitted a credit card company from charging more than 12% interest.  Walter claims that at the same time Citibank was going broke because they were borrowing the money at 20% from Federal Reserve District Banks.

In 1981 Citibank moved its credit card division from New York to South Dakota.  Almost simultaneously there was a U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that a Bank could ‘export’ its interest rate to other states (The Marquette Decision).  This allowed South Dakota to become the credit card capital of America.  In other words, if state law in South Dakota allowed banks to charge 25%, then they could send out credit card offers to all 50 states with wild interest rates, protected by South Dakota law.  Also, Delaware copied South Dakota’s usury laws and soon Wilmington, Delaware became the credit card King of the East.

For the first time in U.S. history there was no limit to the interest rates that banks could charge nationwide.  This permitted credit card companies to expand; soon becoming the most profitable sector in overall banking.  Citibank has been more profitable than Microsoft or Wal-Mart.

Why are credit cards so profitable?

Currently about 145 Million Americans have revolving accounts with credit card companies. In 2003 alone 1.5 trillion dollars was charged onto credit cards.  Approximately 55 million Americans pay off their credit card balance at the end of each month, preventing the banks from making profits off of them.  The top ten credit card companies charge some of their customers 25 to 30% interest, some even pay more than this.  Meanwhile interest rates from the Federal Reserve have been at or near record lows since 9/11, enabling these companies to make sick profits off the 90 million Americans who don’t pay their balance at the end of each month.

On top of this already highly profitable situation, Americans are carrying a record high amount of credit card debt.  The average American family is carrying around $8,000 in revolving credit card debt.  Not to mention that the savings rate of Americans is at it’s lowest since 1933 (The Great Depression).  During the late eighties Andrew Kahr (a banking consultant) convinced many credit card companies to lower their minimum payment from 5% of the balance to 2%.  This allowed the debt to ‘revolve’ longer as the balance would often increase.  In Andrew’s words “Having a lower minimum payment allows you to offer higher credit lines.”  Often customers would carry a higher balance and pay the minimum, allowing the credit card company to maximize their profit making potential.  Every month about 35 million Americans pay only the minimum payment.

Many borrowers seem alright with the idea of high balances so long as they can pay the minimum payment.  And at 2% of the balance this may not prove too difficult.

The Fine Print

Credit card companies use the three major credit history report agencies (Expirian, Transunion, and Equifax) to target borrowers who don’t pay their balances off at the end of each month.  Fair Issac reviews credit histories and issues the FICO scores banks use to determine loan eligibility.  Your FICO score often determines how much interest you will pay on a credit card.  As the issuer of the credit card, the bank can change the terms of your credit card agreement at any time, and for any reason they see fit.  There’s no law that prevents the issuer from changing the conditions of the loan.

Universal Default Rate

If you were to miss a car payment or get behind a month on your mortgage, this can trigger a Universal Default.  This loop hole allows your credit card issuer to raise your interest rate for being a month behind on your car note, house note, or any other financial obligation they become aware of.  It’s in your credit card contract.  These banks rationalize that if you’ve fallen behind on another creditor, you are now considered high risk to them as well (credit card issuer).  Also, if you have high balances with other credit cards, you could fall into the ‘high risk’ zone. This agreement allows the credit issuer to raise your interest rate on items already purchased.  So if you bought a flat screen TV. last year, and your interest rate was 9%, they can increase it to 20% just six months later if they’d like.  What other organizations are allowed to do this?

Smiley VS. Citibank

In 1996 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Smiley vs. Citibank.  The Supreme Court ruled that credit card companies could increase the ‘fees’ associated with their debtors.  So what might have been a $10 late fee has now become a $35.  Since the Smiley ruling, credit card issuers have doubled the amount of revenue they bring in from fees.  Late Fee’s, Over the limit fees, return check fees and on and on.  And once these fees are applied, the bank now has the option to increase your overall interest rate – often doubling it as well.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is part of the Treasury Department. This office regulates the National Banks, including the ones that issue credit cards.  The acting Comptroller of the Currency in 2004, Julie Williams, stated that the OCC has three main purposes.

1. To make sure the banks don’t fail.
2. To insure the integrity of how the banks operate their corporate governance.
3. To make sure that they deal fairly and honestly with their customers.

This office has the ability to take enforcement actions against banks if they deem it necessary.  When asked if she could give an example of when she brought a large institution to task, Julie responded “the action we took against Providian.”  During the late 1990’s San Francisco based Providian was experiencing double digit growth.  They were offering credit to the riskiest of customers with the lowest of credit scores.  Much like the sub prime housing market, Providian was targeting customers that had no business seeking credit in the first place.  Providian would receive payment and deposit the check, but not apply the payment to their customers account, sometimes for weeks.  This would result in late fees and over the limit fees for Providian customers.  Almost 50% of Providian’s profit was made from fees, not interest on the revolving debt.

Pat Wallace, head of the better business bureau in San Francisco, says that the OCC was contacted and offered no help.  In fact, it wasn’t until the local media got involved that the OCC contacted the San Francisco District Attorney’s office.  But the OCC didn’t exactly help.  They informed this D.A. that the OCC was the Federal Authority for these National Banks, and therefore, “You don’t have any jurisdiction.”  Meaning that the D.A. could not prosecute Providian for fraud.  Eventually Providian was slapped with a 300 million dollar judgment, which the OCC took credit for.  The OCC’s main order of business seems to be to restrict local prosecutors from suing National Banks for their ‘loan shark’ practices.  The OCC is trying to eliminate the individual States Attorney Generals from pursuing legal action against these banks.

In 2004 the OCC declared itself the ‘regulator’ of all National Banks.  This is an attempt to insulate the National Banks from the consumer protection laws of individual states.  The OCC trotted out the Providian case as proof of their determination to protect consumers. The Credit Card Industry receives more complaints than any other industry in the country.

Watch the entire PBS investigation by clicking here.

Related Articles

* Reasons not to file Bankruptcy or Settle Your Debts

* Can you go to jail for not paying your debts?

* How to settle your debts on your own

* How to deal with collection agencies

* Sample Debt Validation Letter

* Information on Credit Card Balance Transfers

* How I Escaped Credit Card Debt

* How to seek bargains for food and clothes

Reverse Mortgages are, in my opinion, a last resort for homeowners age 62 or older.  If an agency is offering to help you find a reverse mortgage lender for a ’small percentage’ of the loan then just stop talking to these people.  HUD provides this information without cost, just call 1-800-569-4287 for the name and location of a HUD approved housing counseling agency in your area.  Also, if you are being urged to take out a reverse mortgage to obtain a deferred annuity then stop talking to these people as well.  Deferred annuities are a bad idea for most seniors because they can restrict access to retirement savings well beyond one’s life expectancy.  You can also receive free information about reverse mortgages by contacting AARP at 1-800-209-8085.  Considering that 45% of reverse mortgage borrowers are single women, getting the right advice from objective parties is critical to honest information.  Please do your research and closely analyze the pros and the cons before making a decision about a reverse mortgage.

**Disclaimer – Debtprison.net does not administer legal or financial advice. The contents of this website are my opinions on collection agencies and how to deal with them. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as legal advice or council. No opinions on this website should be used to replace the advice of your financial advisor or your legal council.

The problem here is that there are vast seas of people in various industries (and possibly family members) who would love nothing more than to get their hands on your hard earned money.  A financial decision involving hundreds of thousands of dollars and probably the loss of your home should be made with caution.  So let’s take our time, do our homework, so that we can make an informed decision.  Separating the good information from the bad can be difficult because of all the people trying to get their hands on your money.

A reverse mortgage should only be considered if your income is such that you cannot pay your bills and you plan on living in your home until your death.  You are willing to tap the equity in your home using a reverse mortgage – but only with the complete understanding that your home will likely be sold at the time of your death by the lender – or by a family member selling the home to repay the?reverse mortgage.

What is a reverse mortgage?

From the AARP websiteA reverse mortgage is a special type of home loan that lets a homeowner convert a portion of the equity in his or her home into cash.”  Let’s put this into practice.  Your home’s market value is $250,000 and you only owe $100,000.  This leaves you $150,000 of equity that could possibly be tapped using a reverse mortgage. Let’s say your current house note is $900 per month.  A reverse mortgage could approve a $100,000 loan and supply this in $900 per month increments to you.  You could then use this $900 per month payment from the reverse mortgage to pay your house note.

This is how the commercials for a reverse mortgage can say things like “eliminate your house note,”  or “a reverse mortgage will get rid of your house note and provide you with cash for any use you see fit.”  While all of this is true these commercials fail to mention the “Cost” of this reverse mortgage.  You didn’t actually think they were just going to give you the money with no future financial obligation on your part?

These reverse mortgage loans often have very high fees (more on this later) and interest continues to be added over the life of the loan until it is repaid or you die and your estate has to reconcile the debt against your home.

The good things about a reverse mortgage

The reverse mortgage loan is a mortgage against your house which is paid by a lump sum, monthly payments, or a line of credit – usually some combination of these three. Your qualification for the loan is not dependent on your income or credit rating. Only the value of the home versus equity is considered.  The reverse mortgage does not have to be repaid until you die or move out and you get to remain in your home (keeping the title).  The lender cannot come after your other assets such as other properties or investments, the loan only applies to the house.

The bad things about a reverse mortgage

From consumerlaw.org (you should click on this link) “Reverse mortgages are high-cost loans.  Origination fees and insurance premiums typically eat up $25,000 or more of the total proceeds of a common reverse mortgage on a $250,000 house….Interest charges, which pile up over the life of the loan get added on top of that.”

If you take out a reverse mortgage and then later on decide to move you could be left with less cash than if you had simply sold the home in the first place without acquiring a reverse mortgage.

If you are not in love with your current home perhaps you could just sell it instead.  If you were left with $100,000 cash after the sale, could you move into an apartment instead and just keep the cash on savings?  At a rent of $700 per month that much money would last you about eleven years if applied only to rent.  As you can see there are many options to consider.

**Remember do not take out a reverse mortgage to buy other financial investments.  The fees and interest of the reverse mortgage kill any profit you may earn from investing. Also, it’s true that a reverse mortgage allows you to pass the home on to your heirs – but keep in mind that the price tag of the mortgage will still be attached to it.  What good is passing on a home to heirs with an $110,000 debt unless your estate has enough assets to cover this debt, leaving your heirs with the likely choice of renting out the home or selling it altogether?

This brings me back to my original statement.  Don’t take out a reverse mortgage unless you are cash poor, need money for monthly bills, and you are not bothered by the idea of your home being sold at the time of your death.

The USA Today has an article describing how reverse mortgages could be unwise, especially in early retirement.  In the article they interviewed Ernestine Boach age 62, who had taken out a reverse mortgage to buy deferred annuities since a financial adviser told her it would be a “wonderful deal for me.”?  To keep her home Ernestine ended up taking out a loan in the amount of $140,000 to pay off the reverse mortgage so she could keep the house in the family in the event of her death.

“I was naive,” she says “I still am.  I don’t understand all these policies.  But I hope this story helps someone else.”  Indeed, that makes two of us.

Related Articles

* How to Cheaply Buy a Used Car

* Staying on Budget is All About Focus

* Unearthed – Why Funerals Are so Expensive

* Completely Insane Motorcycle Financing

Americans should immediately stop borrowing money in the form of credit cards, home loans, vehicle loans, and retail store credit. Just credit card debt alone has reached 915 billion in the U.S. currently. Not using credit is an unpopular idea. It’s unpopular because our banker controlled culture has convinced us that using credit is not only necessary, but should be relished. Our culture hasn’t always been convinced that borrowing money was such a great idea. In the first half of our country’s history, credit was not available as it is today. Conventional wisdom at that time promoted savings first – and then purchases.

**Disclaimer – Debtprison.net does not administer legal or financial advice. The contents of this website are my opinions on collection agencies and how to deal with them. Nothing on this website should be interpreted as legal advice or council. No opinions on this website should be used to replace the advice of your financial advisor or your legal council.

Before we get into the bulk of the article I would like to take a moment to disprove the most popular myth about using credit.  Here’s the example that I normally read:

“If you can put $8,000 into a mutual fund earning 14% (instead of paying $8,000 cash for the car), and have a car loan which has an interest rate of 6%, you’d be stupid not to finance the car.”  The idea is that you make a little money in the long run due to the difference in interest rates (in this case 8% difference).

There are two reasons why this is not an accurate statement.  First of all, when you finance a car you will pay a higher selling price for the car.  For example, when you finance a car for $10,000, I’ll bet you my pinky finger that I could go out and buy the same year, make, and model for $8,500 or even $8,000.  So by going the financing route you’ve already lost $1,500 to $2,000.  People are almost always willing to compromise on the price if you have cash.  This is especially true of car dealerships.  Using financing encourages buyers to spend more than what they otherwise would.

Secondly, when you pay cash you now have an asset, which you could sell at any time and get your money back.  The person financing has to first overcome negative equity, before any positive equity exists in a vehicle that won’t be his asset for 48 months.  Meanwhile you’re now putting your cash into a mutual fund earning 14%, instead of earning 8% like the other guy (which is barely above inflation)! 

Not to mention that Billy Bob who financed actually lost money by paying the financing.  Allow me to make this clear.  You saved money on the sale by paying cash, and you saved again by not paying the interest.  Billy Bob paid a higher selling price for the car and paid interest.  Who do think has more money at the end of the 48 months?

Please consider submitting a review of this article by clicking here.

What if credit didn’t exist?

This is an interesting question. Have you ever thought about it? Well, for starters your personal and national debt obligations wouldn’t exist (we’ll discuss the national debt owed later on). If you wanted to buy something you would simply save money up front and then make a purchase. In discussing this premise with a friend of mine he asked “but how can you buy a car if you don’t have any money?” One could apply this same question to houses, land, or any tangible item. The answer is quite simple. You would have to save the money first and then buy a car. Ride a bike for 6 months and save the cash. People do this every day. If you start your purchasing lifestyle in debt, then chances are that you’ll remain there – because you’ll never get out of debt.

If credit didn’t exist individuals would save up front and then buy. This would affect our purchasing decisions. Watching your savings exit the hard earned account for purchases would encourage you to save more money. Instead of buying a new car you would most likely buy used. Bargains would be sought after. So not only are you not using credit, but money is being saved twice since you’re looking for the deals. Using credit encourages shoppers to buy new, highly priced retail merchandise.

Let’s use the example of buying a vehicle again. Perhaps you want a nice vehicle but don’t have any cash on hand. Most people are in this situation, but let’s look at it a different way. Ride the bicycle and save $400.00 per month. In six months that would give you $2,400. A great ride can’t be bought for that, but you can purchase something that would transport you from point A to point B. Since credit isn’t being used you are looking for the most car for your money.

By shopping around one can easily get a vehicle retail priced at $3,500 for the $2,400 you have in cash. I know because that’s the way I buy cars. So, now you are driving a vehicle that you purchased for $2,400. Keep saving the $400 per month. In six more months you will have $2,400 more in cash and a vehicle worth at least what you paid for it. Now sell your car for $2,500 and take your $4,900 cash and buy a newer vehicle with less miles than the old one. Last year I bought a five year old GMC Sonoma with 47,000 miles for $5,000. The truck looked and ran like new. Now I have a vehicle that will last me 4 or 5 years, and I only saved for twelve months. You can apply this same method to buying houses and land. Start training yourself to save and then buy.

Avoiding loans saves lots of money

 If you refuse to borrow money, hundreds of thousands of dollars will be saved over the course of your life time. Most people will finance a car for 60 months. Currently the average car loan is probably close to $30,000. For this discussion we’ll keep it at a conservative $20,000 price tag. We’ll assume the interest rate is 6% for 60 months. The total amount paid in interest over the course of the loan is $3,199. If you buy eight new vehicles over the course of your life, that’s just over $25,000. And keep in mind that you bought a lower end car. Of course this discussion assumes that inflation is null (if only)! You can download the spreadsheet that I use to compare loans by clicking here. This spreadsheet uses microsoft excel and allows you to compare four loans at once. It’s free, contains no adware or spyware, and comes courtesy from my friend Jeff at carbuyingtips.com.

Financing a house is costly. If you finance a $250,000 valued home for 30 years, at a fixed interest rate of 8% – you pay $410,000 in interest alone! I could build four small houses for that! That much money could buy 10 brand new Toyota’s straight off the lot, making the salesmans month. This is $410,000 that could have been put towards retirement or college savings for your children.

Paying with cash encourages you to find bargains

When it comes to using credit cards or seeking a car loan, most people are buying new. When buying new from a retail establishment you end up paying top dollar for the purchase. And then, you pay even more as interest is tacked on to this high dollar asset. Essentially you are losing money twice. Paying cash encourages one to look for bargains. It’s just a matter of human nature because you’re watching your savings leave the confines of your precious treasure chest. For some reason this seems to have a restrictive psychological effect on my purchasing habits.

The philosophy of freedom

Something should be said about borrowing money and freedom. When you are in debt to a creditor, obligations must be satisfied or negative consequences will ensue. The more money you owe – the stronger the burden of debt weighs on your mind. It’s the loss of your crops come harvest time, the sweat of your brow, the hard work of your very existence - must be handed over to someone else.

When you owe other people money you are not free. Your life and earnings are indebted to the creditor. I look at my own life as proof. My savings are non-existent and I lack the money to go out and spend recreationally. My debts are too high. All of my debts combined are equal to my annual income. One thing is for sure, I can feel the weight of my debt sitting on my shoulders every minute of every day. There’s no point in saving money until I pay off this high interest debt.

A friend said the other day that debt seemed smart as long as you have more in assets than you do in debt. Well this sounds like a good idea, but what’s the negative side to this banker’s fantasy? What if you become permanently disabled? Could you still afford to pay your bills – or would you have to immediately sell off assets to pay your debt, and therefore be left with very little? The advantage of having no debt is that all of your assets are paid for. So when bad times come along (and they will), you’ll be able to manage them with ease. Not to mention all the money one loses by paying interest.

My room mate had $4,000 in credit card debt, but $10,000 in mutual funds. The mutual funds earn 9% interest while the credit card debt costs 15% interest. So I asked him “Would you take out $4,000 as a cash advance from your credit card to purchase $4,000 in mutual fund assets?” His answer was a firm “NO”! I explained to him that by having the credit card debt in contrast to his mutual fund assets, he was in fact accomplishing this very act. The correct answer is to rid one’s self of needless debt. It steals precious treasure from your own life while benefiting others whom haven’t earned it. Ridding one’s self of debt leads to personal economic freedom and the financial security of knowing that one’s assets are paid for.

Many people like me have to think about the financial consequences of not paying their debt before we make any spending decision. I am a prisoner to debt, a slave to personal finances. My goal is to pay off all debts as fast as possible. I’m not financially free until the last cent owed to my creditors is fully satisfied.

Our National Debt obligations

Our U.S. Government borrows money from private banks and foreign countries. Currently our National Debt is 9.2 trillion. That means if America wants to pay off all the debt we owe tomorrow – all 305,000 legal citizens (children included), would have to pay $30,321 and some change. The National Debt has increased over 3 trillion dollars during the George W. Bush Administration.

This is money that will have to be repaid. Where do you think they are going to get the money? That’s right – they get the money by taxing the hell out of working people. Currently the Government (local, state, federal) takes approximately 40% of a person’s earned income.

How can you afford interest when you’re missing 40% of your income? If you can give me a logical explanation, then by all means, please do. 

If you enjoyed this article you can help me by writing a brief review of it by clicking here.